Drawing for ENABLING NEXT GENERATION NETWORKS

USPTO serial 75902549

ENABLING NEXT GENERATION NETWORKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENABLING NEXT GENERATION NETWORKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank M . Caprio

FRANK M CAPRIO LANIER, FORD, SHAVER & PAYNEP O BOX 2087HUNTSVILLE, AL 35804UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT, NAMELY TELECOMMUNICATIONS TEST AND MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT, TELECOMMUNICATIONS PORTABLE TEST EQUIPMENT, TELECOMMUNICATIONS HAND-HELD TEST EQUIPMENT, DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER LINE (DSL) TEST EQUIPMENT, HIGH BIT RATE DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER LINE (HDSL) TEST EQUIPMENT, HDSL2 TEST EQUIPMENT, CIRCUIT VERIFYING EQUIPMENT, TELECOMMUNICATIONS CIRCUIT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND CONTROL DEVICES, LOOP MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, CENTRAL OFFICE INSTALLED BROADBAND TEST AND PROVISIONING EQUIPMENT, COPPER WIRE CROSS-CONNECT EQUIPMENT, SOFTWARE NETWORK MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, AND CUSTOMER PREMISE NETWORK TERMINATION DEVICESACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Feb 9, 2001ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jan 25, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Dec 8, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 14, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance