Drawing for MAGAZINES.COM

USPTO serial 75902670

MAGAZINES.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WILLIAMS, IRENE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAGAZINES.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THOR Y. URNESS

THOR Y URNESS BOULT. CUMMINGS, CONNERS & BERRY. PLC414 UNION ST STE 1600POST OFFICE BOX 198062NASHVILLE, TN 37219

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Interactive online ordering services via the global computer network featuring magazinesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 31, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jan 10, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Nov 2, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Nov 1, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Sep 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 23, 2004CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Dec 3, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Nov 4, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 5, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 3, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 21, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Dec 12, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
May 24, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 8, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 10, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance