USPTO serial 75902737
XTREME FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with XTREME FOOTBALL LEAGUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
STAMFORD, CT
STAMFORD, CT
WORLD WRESTLING FEDERATION ENTERTAINMENT INC.
STAMFORD, CT
Other trademarks owned by WORLD WRESTLING FEDERATION ENTERTAINMENT INC.
Florida Indoor Football Partnership Group
Pensacola, FL
Other trademarks owned by Florida Indoor Football Partnership Group
CHICAGO, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FRANKLIN B MOLIN
FRANKLIN B MOLIN KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLPHENRY W OLIVER BLDG535 SMITHFIELD STPITTSBURG, PA 15222-2312Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | MEN'S, WOMEN'S, AND CHILDREN'S CLOTHING, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, TANK TOPS, SWEATSHIRTS, SWEATPANTS, PULLOVERS, SHIRTS, BLOUSES, TROUSERS, SKIRTS, PAJAMAS, INFANT WEAR, ARTICLES OF UNDERCLOTHING, FOUNDATION GARMENTS, HOSIERY, HATS, BELTS, GLOVES, JACKETS, COATS, OVERCOATS, RAIN COATS, SLIPPERS, ROBES, JOGGING SUITS, EXERCISE PANTS, EXERCISE SUITS, COSTUMES, LEOTARDS, SWIMSUITS, ATHLETIC UNIFORMS, JERSEYS, GYMNASTIC TRAINING PANTS, BOXER SHORTS, SHORT PANTS, GYM SHORTS, SPATS, TRUNKS, WRISTBANDS, SWEATPANTS, SHORTS, TIES, BANDANNAS, HEADBANDS, HEADGEAR, NAMELY CAPS, FOOTWEAR, NAMELY SHOES, SOCKS, SNEAKERS, BOOTS, AND ATHLETIC SHOES, GLOVES, NECKTIES | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES; NAMELY, PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL GAMES AND EXHIBITIONS; PROVIDING FOOTBALL NEWS AND INFORMATION VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by XFL, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by XFL, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by WORLD WRESTLING FEDERATION ENTERTAINMENT INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Florida Indoor Football Partnership Group
- Other trademarks owned by AF2 ENTERPRISES LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named XTREME FOOTBALL LEAGUE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 27, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |