Drawing for MLP

USPTO serial 75902759

MLP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, AMY E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MLP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce W. Schwab

BRUCE W SCHWAB TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009INTEGRATED CIRCUITS IN THE FIELD OF AUDIO CODING, RECORDING AND PLAYBACK; AUDIO/VIDEO AMPLIFIERS AND RECEIVERS; TELEVISION RECEIVERS; VIDEO MONITORS; AUDIO AND VIDEO RECORDERS; AUDIO AND VIDEO DISC PLAYERS; AUDIO AND VIDEO DISC DUBBING DECKS; FEATURE OF COMPACT DISCS, PRE-RECORDED DVD VIDEO DISCS, AND DVD AUDIO DISCS, EACH FEATURING MUSIC, THE SPOKEN WORD, SOUND EFFECTS, ANIMATION, AND DOCUMENTARIES, ENTERTAINMENT AND INFORMATION IN THE FIELDS OF ACADEMIC, ARTISTIC, COMEDIC, DRAMATIC, INSTRUCTIONAL, LITERARY, MUSICAL, AND RELIGIOUS PERFORMANCES AND WORKS; AUDIO AND VIDEO ENCODERS AND DECORDERS AND THEIR PARTS, COMPACT DISC PLAYERS, DVD AUDIO PLAYERS AND DVD VIDEO PLAYERS; REMOTE CONTROL UNITS FOR THESE GOODS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR CODING AND DECODING DIGITAL DATA IN THE FIELD OF DVD AUDIO AND VIDEO DISCSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 12, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 10, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 10, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 10, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 9, 2004ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Sep 16, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 18, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 18, 2004CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 13, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 3, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 7, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 8, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance