USPTO serial 75902794
PAY SMART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 15, 2005
- Examiner
- BROWN, BRIAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PAY SMART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Providian Financial Corporation
San Francisco, CA
Providian Financial Corporation
San Francisco, CA
Providian Financial Corporation
San Francisco, CA
SEATTLE, WA
SEATTLE, WA
SEATTLE, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jessica L. Rothstein
Jessica L. Rothstein GOODWIN PROCTER LLP620 Eighth AvenueThe New York Times BuildingNew York, NY 10018Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Service by which customers can make a telephone request to make payments to their credit card accounts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 27, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Providian Financial Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Providian Financial Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Providian Financial Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by NEW AMERICAN CAPITAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK
- Other trademarks owned by MERCER ACQUISITION LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named PAY SMART
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 1, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |