USPTO serial 75902812
BIRTHDAY BUTLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WINTER, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIRTHDAY BUTLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David C. West
FREDRIKSON & BYRON PA DAVID C W4000 PILLSBURY CTR200 S SIXTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1425Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | PROVIDING AN INTERACTIVE COMPUTER DATABASE FEATURING AN AUTOMATICALLY UPDATING ADDRESS BOOK, PERSONAL PLANNER, CALENDAR, DATE REMINDER, AND TRAVEL PLANNER; ORGANIZING OF DATES AND EVENTS AND NOTIFICATION SERVICES FOR OTHERS VIA E-MAIL AND E-MAIL MANAGERS PROVIDED VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK BY PROVIDING APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER SERVICES, NAMELY, BY HOSTING COMPUTER APPLICATION SOFTWARE ON A COMPUTER SERVER FOR OTHERS FOR REMINDING USERS IN ALL PHASES OF THE SHOPPING/PURCHASING CYCLE OF APPOINTMENTS OR SPECIAL OCCASIONS FOR WHICH THEY NEED TO BUY A GIFT, FOR ENABLING BROWSING, SELECTING AND ORDERING ITEMS FOR PURCHASE FROM RETAILERS AND WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTORS, AND FOR FULFILLING AND SHIPPING ORDERS, ALL PROVIDED VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 18, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |