USPTO serial 75902884
POOKIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POOKIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas L. Tschida
DOUGLAS L TSCHIDA633 LARPENTEUR AVE WSTE BSAINT PAUL, MN 55113Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | toys; stuffed toys; wind- up toys; musical toys; dolls; doll clothing; doll accessories; soft sculpture dolls; soft sculpture toys; puppets; playsets for dolls; balls; toy blocks; games and equipment sold as a unit; game equipment; board games; puzzles; music boxes; balloons; toy banks; cases; computer game cassettes, cartridges and equipment containing memory devices; gaming equipment; video games; electronic games; electronic toys; ice skates; roller skates; jump ropes; kites; kite accessories, namely strings, reels, and tails; Christmas decorations and accessories; and yo-yos | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |