USPTO serial 75903447
SNAX EXPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SNAX EXPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Rodman Steele, Jr.
J RODMAN STEELE JR QUARLES & BRADY LLP222 LAKEVIEW AVE 4TH FLP O BOX 3188WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33402-3188Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | snack foods, namely, potato chips and potato sticks; and processed nuts | ACTIVE | Mar 9, 2000 |
| 030 | pretzels; pasta snacks; popped popcorn and cheese-flavored popped popcorn; tortilla chips; regular and flavored corn chips; corn-based, wheat-based, and rice-based puffed snacks; snack crackers; cheese curls and cheese twists; and cheese-flavored puffed snacks | ACTIVE | Mar 9, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 15, 2000 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |