USPTO serial 75903559
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph A. Naughton
JOSEPH A NAUGHTON WOODARD, EMHARDT, NAUGHTON, MORIARTY, ETBANK ONE CTR TWR111 MONUMENT CIR STE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-5137| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | audio and video devices containing material on the subjects of - quality, productivity, durability, comfort, and other criteria for the selection of work access products; and proper use and safety in the use and maintenance of work access products and related equipment; and work access issues such as OSHA and other governmental regulations and changes and industry standards | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | printed materials, namely, brochures, pamphlets and instruction manuals on the subjects of - quality, productivity, durability, comfort, and other criteria for the selection of work access products; and printed materials, namely, brochures, pamphlets and instruction manuals on the subjects of proper use and safety in the use and maintenance of work access products and related equipment; and printed materials, namely, brochures, pamphlets and instruction manuals on the subjects of work access issues such as OSHA and other governmental regulations and changes and industry standards | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | dissemination of advertising matter for others in the field of work access products and services; promoting the sale of the work access goods and services of others through distribution of printed material | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | educational services, namely, conducting classes and seminars both in person and over a global computer network on the subjects of quality, productivity, durability, comfort, and other criteria for the selection of work access products; and educational services, namely, conducting classes and seminars both in person and over a global computer network on proper use and safety in the use and maintenance of work access products and related equipment; educational services, namely, conducting classes and seminars both in person and over a global computer network in the field of work access issues such as OSHA and other governmental regulations and changes and industry standards relating to proper use and safety in the use of work access products and related equipment | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 22, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |