USPTO serial 75903776
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Renee J. Rymarz
RENEE J RYMARZ8310 16TH STSTURTEVANT, WI 53177UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | CLEANING AND DEGREASING PREPARATIONS FOR USE ON HARD SURFACES; GLASS CLEANING PREPARATIONS; ALL-PURPOSE CLEANING PREPARATIONS WITH DISINFECTING PROPERTIES; FLOOR CLEANING PREPARATIONS; FLOOR FINISHING COMPOUNDS; SINK, SHOWER, TUB, AND TILE CLEANING PREPARATIONS; TOILET BOWL CLEANING PREPARATIONS; AND ANTIBACTERIAL SOAPS | ACTIVE | Mar 31, 2002 |
| 005 | ALL-PURPOSE DISINFECTANTS; AIR FRESHENERS AND ROOM DEODORANTS; AND SANITIZING SOLUTIONS | ACTIVE | Mar 31, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 29, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 13, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 7, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 6, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |