Drawing for CAMERAWORKS.COM

USPTO serial 75903838

CAMERAWORKS.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FLETCHER, TRACY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAMERAWORKS.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas A. Rettew

DOUGLAS A RETTEW FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, ET AL1300 I ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Online photography contests to promote the sale of products and services of others; online retail store services featuring photographs and photography productsACTIVE—
038Providing electronic bulletin boards and chatrooms in the field of photography; providing electronic delivery of photographs and information in the field of photography; providing online facilities for interaction with other computer users, namely, bulletin boards, discussion groups, moderated discussions, listserves, and chatrooms in the field of photography and streaming audio and visual discussions on the Internet in the field of photographyACTIVE—
042Providing information in the field of photography; providing an online collection of photographs and online database for users to display their own photographsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 30, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 28, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 19, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 15, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 30, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 10, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 30, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 12, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 7, 2001RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Nov 28, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 28, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 29, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance