USPTO serial 75903996
IBIKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IBIKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOE A BROCK II
JOE A BROCK II OPPENHEIMER WOLFF & DONNELLY LLP1825 EYE ST NW STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | FINANCIAL COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE BY BUSINESS IN ANALYZING AND STRUCTURING FINANCES AND FOR ASSISTING OTHER IN DEVELOPING FINANCIAL STRATEGIES AND OBTAINMENT FINANCIAL GOALS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROGRAMS, NAMELY, DATABASE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE FIELDS OF BUSINESS AND CORPORATE FINANCE, INVESTMENT, MONEY AND BANKING, TAXES, ASSET ACQUISITION, BUDGETING AND PURCHASING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROGRAMS FOR BUSINESSES WHICH PROVIDE FINANCIAL CALCULATION AND ANALYSIS SERVICES AND INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT TOOLS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROGRAMS FOR PROVIDING INFORMATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF AIDING ENTITIES IN ANALYZING AND STRUCTURING FINANCES WITH A PRIMARY OBJECTIVE BEING THE OBTAINMENT OF GOALS INCLUDING FINANCIAL GOALS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROGRAMS FOR PROVIDING INFORMATION FOR ALLOWING A BUSINESS ENTITY TO INTEGRATE FINANCIAL GOALS TOGETHER WITH FINANCIAL DATA IN ORDER TO SUGGEST AND/OR OUTLINE A STRATEGY FOR ACHIEVING SUCH GOALS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROGRAMS FOR ENABLING AN BUSINESS ENTITY TO BE MATCHED WITH BUSINESSES THAT ARE SUITED TO AID A BUSINESS CUSTOMER IN OBTAINING SUCH GOALS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ibiks Technology, A Luxembourg Holding Company
- Other trademarks owned by Ibiks Technology, A Luxembourg Holding Company
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named IBIKS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 18, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 26, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |