USPTO serial 75904012
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Travelers Rest, SC
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William L Kilma
WILLIAM L KILMA KLIMA & PEZZLO PCP O BOX 2855STAFFORD, VA 22555-2855UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | a house mark for industrial, commercial, institutional and consumer chemicals and concentrates, namely, additives for further use in cleaning and for use in the manufacture of antifreeze, antiseptic sprays, degreasing preparations and fragrances, chemical preparations for melting snow and ice, plant food, stain repellants for clothing, carpet and textiles, artificial sweeteners, wall covering adhesives, water purifying chemicals for swimming pools, water proofing chemical compositions for fabric and leather, and windshield antifreeze fluids and de-icer fluids | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | a house mark for industrial, commercial, and consumer concentrates, namely, air deodorant, air fresheners, carpet deodorizers, household deodorant, automobile deodorant, all purpose disinfectants, insect repellants, insecticides, medicated mouthwash, sanitizers, medicated shampoo, weed killers | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | A HOUSE MARK FOR INDUSTRIAL, COMMERCIAL, AND CONSUMER CHEMICALS AND CONCENTRATES THEREOF, NAMELY, MR DEODORANT, MR FRESHENERS, CARPET DEODORIZES, DEODORANT, DEODORIZERS, DISINFECTANTS, INSECT REPELLANTS, INSECTICIDES, MEDICATED MOUTHWASH, SANTIZERS, SHAMPOO, WASHES AND WEED KILLERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | sprayers, namely, hand operated sprayers for use in cleaning, and single neck spray bottles and multiple neck spray bottles for use in cleaning | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | chemical and concentrate packaging, namely, cartridges namely spray bottle and other dispenser cartridges, chemical and chemical concentrate packaging, namely, spray bottle and other dispenser packaging, plastic packets, namely, spray bottle and other dispenser packaging, inserts and capsules | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | food and beverage packaging and food and beverage concentrate packaging, namely beverage dispensers, bottles sold empty, beverageware, buckets, containers, dispensers, beverage dispensers, soap dispensers, drinking vessels, flasks, glasses, holders, pails, sprayers, vessels, and water bottles | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 26, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |