USPTO serial 75904048
WEE WILLIE WUBBY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WEE WILLIE WUBBY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Schnurr
David J. Schnurr Miller Thomson LLP295 Hagey Blvd., Suite 300Waterloo, Ontario, N2L6R5CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | plush toys in the form of a character in a story about a group of lovable creatures called "Wubbies" | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 12, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |