USPTO serial 75904067
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce D. Holloway
BRUCE D HOLLOWAY LAW OFFICES OF BRUCE D HOLLOWAYPO BOX 2059DUBLIN, CA 94568UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric motors for boats; electro-hydraulic assist power steering systems composed of an electric motor, pump and controller; transmission gears and gear reduction units for boats | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Electronic systems for use in boats, namely electric and hybrid vehicle drive train systems composed of internal combustion engines, generators, electric motors, power controllers, inverters, computer software and computer firmware; electronic systems for use in boats, namely energy management systems composed of an electric controller, batteries, chargers, computer software and computer firmware; electrical controllers, electric converters, battery chargers, inverters, and accompanying computer software for use in the operation and control of electric and hybrid vehicle drive train systems, energy management systems, energy storage systems, and the components of the systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | MANUFACTURE TO THE ORDER AND/OR TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF OTHERS OF ELECTRIC AND HYBRID DRIVE TRAIN AND ENERGY MANAGEMENT AND STORAGE SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS FOR USE IN MARINE APPLICATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF NEW PRODUCTS FOR OTHERS, DESIGN AND TESTING OF NEW PRODUCTS FOR OTHERS, AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONSULTATION SERVICES AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS, ALL IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRIC AND HYBRID DRIVE SYSTEMS FOR NAUTICAL APPLICATIONS, ENERGY MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR NAUTICAL APPLICATIONS, AND BATTERY AND FUEL CELL TECHNOLOGIES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 30, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 29, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 25, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |