USPTO serial 75904160
PRIAMUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- PHOTOCOMP COORDINATOR
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRIAMUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
20014 San Sebastian Guipuzcoa, ES
20014 San Sebastian Guipuzcoa, ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
L. Lawton Rogers, III
DIANOOSH SALEHI DUANE MORRIS LLP1667 K ST NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wine and distilled spirits | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | TCAS | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED STAT IS TTAB | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 9, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |