USPTO serial 75904208
CREOLE JOE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CREOLE JOE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill M. Pietrini
STEVEN M WEINBERG ESQ GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP2375 E CAMELBACK RD STE 700PHOENIX, AZ 85016-9000UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Night club services and restaurant services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 15, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 8, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 17, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 17, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 14, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 13, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |