Drawing for GREEN TURTLE TECHNOLOGIES LTD

USPTO serial 75904281

GREEN TURTLE TECHNOLOGIES LTD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREEN TURTLE TECHNOLOGIES LTD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cory M. Amron

CORY M AMRON VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR AND PEASE LLP1828 L ST 11TH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011pH neutralization system for waste water treatment, comprised of a steel frame, a vertical pump and electronic measuring device and magnesium oxide for neutralizing waste waterACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 5, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 17, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 7, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 14, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 8, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2001CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 17, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 9, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 13, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance