USPTO serial 75904281
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Green Turtle Technologies Ltd.
Etobicoke, Ontario M9C SK1, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cory M. Amron
CORY M AMRON VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR AND PEASE LLP1828 L ST 11TH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | pH neutralization system for waste water treatment, comprised of a steel frame, a vertical pump and electronic measuring device and magnesium oxide for neutralizing waste water | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |