USPTO serial 75904352
ALARA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALARA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Max Moskowtiz
MAX MOSKOWTIZ OSTROLENK FABER LLP1180 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS7TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting the pharmaceutical products of others, excluding transdermal estrogen replacement patches and pharmaceutical products in the derma or topical fields, through the distribution of printed and audio promotional materials; wholesale distributorship services featuring pharmaceuticals excluding transdermal estrogen replacement patches and pharmaceutical products in the derma or topical fields | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Manufacture of pharmaceutical products, other than transdermal estrogen replacement patches and pharmaceutical products in the derma or topical field, to the order and specification of others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Alara Healthcare Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Alara Healthcare Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named ALARA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 7, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 14, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 22, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 7, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 4, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |