Drawing for STANFORD MICRODEVICES

USPTO serial 75904427

STANFORD MICRODEVICES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RITCHIE, BRANDEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STANFORD MICRODEVICES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew P. Bridges

ANDREW P BRIDGES WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATIPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT, NAMELY INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, MICROCHIPS, SEMICONDUCTORS, AMPLIFIERS, TRANSISTORS, SWITCHES, MIXERS, MODULATORS AND GAIN BLOCKS; ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS FOR THE TRANSMISSION AND RECEIVING OF VOICE OR DATA, NAMELY INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, MICROCHIPS, SEMICONDUCTORS, AMPLIFIERS, TRANSISTORS, SWITCHES, MIXERS, MODULATORS AND GAIN BLOCKS; ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS FOR THE WIRELESS AND WIRED TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRIES, NAMELY INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, MICROCHIPS, SEMICONDUCTORS, AMPLIFIERS, TRANSISTORS, SWITCHES, MIXERS, MODULATORS AND GAIN BLOCKSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 18, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 5, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance