USPTO serial 75904823
IBIKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BERK, STEVEN R
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IBIKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joe A. Brock II
JOE A BROCK II HICKMAN COLEMAN & HUGHES LLP1825 EYE ST NW STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial services, namely, personal financial analysis and consultation, personal financial analysis and consultation via global computer networks, financial planning and portfolio management, all of the above designed to aid individuals and families in analyzing and structuring their personal finances; Providing information in the fields of finance, investment, money and banking, retirement planning, estate planning and wills, real estate, family budgeting and purchasing by means of a global computer network; Providing information for aiding individuals and families in analyzing and structuring their personal finances via the global communications network; providing information which allows a consumer to be matched with businesses which are appropriate for obtaining her/his financial goals via the global computer network; providing private and business financial analysis and investment portfolio management services by means of a global computer network; providing information for the purpose of aiding individuals and business entities in analyzing and structuring their finances with a primary objective being the obtainment of goals including financial goals via the global computer network; Providing information for allowing individuals and businesses to integrate personal and financial goals together with financial data in order to outline investment strategies via the global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 30, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 7, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |