USPTO serial 75904827
PAVERCAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2684138Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 4, 2003
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PAVERCAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Prior Lake, MN
Prior Lake, MN
Prior Lake, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. O'Loughlin
REBECCA JO BISHOP ALTERA LAW GROUP LLC6500 CITY W PKWY STE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55344UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and machine parts used to aid in the installation of segmental pavers | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Feb 23, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2007 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2003 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 3, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 26, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 19, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |