USPTO serial 75904944
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph E. Walsh, Jr.
JOSEPH E WALSH JR HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, PLCSTE 4005445 CORPORATE DRTROY, MI 48098| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | non-metallic building and construction materials, namely, barriers, sheets, chip boards, particle boards, paneling, planks, rubber, flashing, lumber, joists, trusses, blocks, bricks, posts, poles, slabs, fascia, soffets, cladding, shores, supports, braces, fabric and sheeting for construction, erosion control fabric, trestles, acoustical and insulating boards, blocks, sashes, muntins, spacers, panels and concrete forms; platforms, elevating and support equipment in the nature of non-metal ladders, industrial step stands, scaffolds, scaffold planks, pedestals for supporting bench grinders, support stands for drain cleaning equipment, support stands for power-operated tools, support stands for electric motors and rolling warehouse ladders | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | full line of non-metal storage and organizer products, shelving systems, shelves, storage racks, storage carts, cabinet units, drawer units, drawers, storage chests, work benches, desks, work stations, tool boxes, non-metal ladders, drawers, hooks, and non-metal mounting and support hardware namely, casters, caster breaks, floor locks, hanger bars, bar supports, bar connectors, bar endcaps, bar adapters, wall brackets, wall clips, support brackets, shelf clips, support poles, shelf supports, jointer plates, wall hooks, hooks, trays, drawer stops, ladder levelers, ladder stabilizers, ladder tie downs, run locks, shelf supports, shelf connectors, shelf endcaps, shelf adapters | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 8, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |