Drawing for EMERSON MEANS BUSINESS

USPTO serial 75905658

EMERSON MEANS BUSINESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with EMERSON MEANS BUSINESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph E. Walsh, Jr.

MICHAEL P BRENNAN HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, PLCSTE 4005445 CORPORATE DRTROY, MI 48098

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Abrasive papers, abrasive discs, flexible abrasives, liquid abrasives, lapping films, cleaning polish, polishing suspensions, polishing cloths and applicators, cleaning preparations and solvents for use in and with commercial and industrial cleaning and polishing equipmentACTIVE—
004Lubricants and adhesives for industrial and commercial useACTIVE—
006A complete line of metal ladders, prefabricated metal platforms, step stands, and metal parts and metal accessories therefor, namely, hooks and hook assemblies, pole grips, ladder stabilizing and adjusting equipment, namely, spurs, shoes, pulleys, sheaves, metal mounting and support hardware, rung locks and rung lock systems, metal shelves and shelving systems and rung jacks; metal valves, metal control valves, flow measurement valves and devices, metal valve balls and cones, metal valve actuators, metal forgings, wheeled transports, metal workbenches, and metal tool boxesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 8, 2003GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 9, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 3, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Jan 15, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 12, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 18, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance