Drawing for KINDERLINGS

USPTO serial 75905740

KINDERLINGS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAST, PAUL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KINDERLINGS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edwin Komen

EDWIN KOMEN SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP11TH FL E1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Plush toys, toy action figures and finger puppetsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 15, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 24, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 24, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 3, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 28, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 19, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 30, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 23, 2003REINREINSTATED—
May 23, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 9, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 14, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 28, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 14, 2001ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 15, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 2, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 9, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 25, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 21, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance