USPTO serial 75905791
TECHZONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TECHZONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY D. COHEN
JEFFREY D COHENP O BOX 12865LA JOLLA, CA 92039-9865UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer services; namely, providing a centralized online knowledge base featuring information related to the field of embedded software development, design of 3-D display software, networking technology and other software; providing online source of software algorithms related to the field of embedded software development, design of 3-D display software, networking technology and other software; providing online links to software development resources and information; providing online an electronic bulletin and message board for computer users concerning the field of software development; sales of computer software; providing specific solutions to user-entered questions in the field of embedded software development, design of 3-D display software, networking technology and other software; providing comparative information on the software and hardware in the field of embedded development including reviews of embedded operating systems and quality/performance issues, via the global computer information network | ACTIVE | Mar 10, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |