USPTO serial 75905894
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gordon W Hueschen
G PATRICK SAGE HUESCHEN & SAGE500 COLUMBIA PLZ 350 E MICHIGAN AVEKALAMAZOO, MI 49007-3856UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations, namely, anti-depressants, anti-cancerous preparations; vaccines, medicated preparations for the prevention and treatment of respiratory diseases and infections, medicated preparations for the prevention and treatment of prostatic and urinary disorders and their consequences; dietetic preparations for medically restricted diets, dietary supplements | ACTIVE | Mar 28, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 17, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |