Drawing for ACCELERATOR FUND

USPTO serial 75905980

ACCELERATOR FUND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACCELERATOR FUND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lorin S. Fine

LORIN S FINE WEIL GOTSHAL AND MANGES LLP767 5TH AVE FL CONC1NEW YORK, NY 10153-0119UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036financial investment services, namely private equity fund partnerships requiring a minimum investment of $1,000,000, whose primary objective is to achieve significant long-term capital appreciation by acquiring equity securitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 9, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 4, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 26, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 26, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 29, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 9, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 30, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 25, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 11, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance