USPTO serial 75906025
NONINVASIVE TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 17, 2002
- Examiner
- OLANDRIA, WARREN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NONINVASIVE TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ellicott City, MD
Ellicott City, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard S. Stevens
HOWARD S STEVENS WRIGHT, CONSTABLE & SKEEN, LLPONE CHARLES CTR 16TH FL100 N CHARLES STBALTIMORE, MD 21201-3812Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Medical research and testing services which are noninvasive in nature; scientific research and testing methods which are noninvasive in nature | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 5, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 14, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 25, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |