USPTO serial 75906083
ONEPATH NETWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONEPATH NETWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES J. RAUBICHECK
CHARLES J RAUBICHECK FROMMER, LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP745 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | INSTALLATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING INSTALLATION SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH TRANSMITTER AND RECEIVER UNITS SOLD TO SERVICES PROVIDERS OF BROADBAND VIDEO AND/OR VOICE AND/OR DATA COMMUNICATIONS DELIVERED OVER A SINGLE FIBER-OPTIC OR COAXIAL CABLE TO SUBSCRIBERS IN MULTIPLE DWELLING OR SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | TRAINING SERVICES, NAMELY, TRAINING IN THE USE OF OPERATION OF TRANSMITTER AND RECEIVER UNITS SOLD TO SERVICE PROVIDERS OF BROADBAND VIDEO AND/OR VOICE AND/OR DATA COMMUNICATIONS DELIVERED OVER A SINGLE FIBER-OPTIC OR COAXIAL CABLE TO SUBSCRIBERS IN MULTIPLE-DWELLING OR SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING NETWORK DESIGN AND SITE SURVEY SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH TRANSMITTER AND RECEIVER UNITS SOLD TO SERVICE PROVIDERS OF BROADBAND VIDEO AND/OR VOICE AND/OR DATA COMMUNICATIONS DELIVERED OVER A SINGLE FIBER-OPTIC OR COAXIAL CABLE TO SUBSCRIBERS IN MULTIPLE DWELLING OR SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ONEPATH NETWORKS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Foxcom, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Foxcom, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ONEPATH NETWORKS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 29, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |