Drawing for THERE'S STILL NO EQUAL

USPTO serial 75906165

THERE'S STILL NO EQUAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THERE'S STILL NO EQUAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James B Conte

JAMES B CONTE LEE MANN SMITH MCWILLIAMS SWEENEY, ET ALP O BOX 2786CHICAGO, IL 60690-2786UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic and fiber optic cablesACTIVE—
035Mail order catalogs services, electronic ordering of goods via the telephone and computerized online ordering via a global computer network, all in the field of electronic and fiber optic cables; information services, namely, providing shoppers guide information in the field of electronic and fiber optic cables via the telephone and/or an online global computer networkACTIVE—
042Providing technical information concerning the use and application of electronic and fiber optic cables via the telephone and global computer network; and engineering services in the field of wires and cablesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 21, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 24, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 1, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 18, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 21, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance