USPTO serial 75906260
NATURALLY AGED NO PRESERVATIVE LABATT CRYSTAL COOL CLEAR LAGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NATURALLY AGED NO PRESERVATIVE LABATT CRYSTAL COOL CLEAR LAGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Helen Hill Minsker
HELEN HILL MINSKER BANNER & WITCOFF1001 G ST NW 11TH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4597UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | ALCOHOLIC BREWERY BEVERAGES IN THE NATURE OF A BEER | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Labatt Brewing Company Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Labatt Brewing Company Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named NATURALLY AGED NO PRESERVATIVE LABATT CRYSTAL COOL CLEAR LAGER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |