USPTO serial 75906301
IRT INFRASTRUCTURE REPAIR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 4, 2002
- Examiner
- HALL, ALLISON
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IRT INFRASTRUCTURE REPAIR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Infrastructure Repair Technologies, Inc.
Woburn, MA
Other trademarks owned by Infrastructure Repair Technologies, Inc.
Infrastructure Repair Technologies, Inc.
Woburn, MA
Other trademarks owned by Infrastructure Repair Technologies, Inc.
Infrastructure Repair Technologies, Inc.
Woburn, MA
Other trademarks owned by Infrastructure Repair Technologies, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gretchen M. Hosty
Gretchen M. Hosty Michael Best & Friedrich LLPSuite 2000180 N. Stetson Ave.Chicago, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, NAMELY, CONCRETE REHABILITATION, RECONSTRUCTION, DESALINIZATION, REALKALISATION AND CORROSION PASSIVATION, UTILIZING ELECTROCHEMICAL METHODS FOR RESTORATION OF BRIDGES, PARKING STRUCTURES, ROADS, DOCKS, BUILDING FACADES, RETAINING WALLS, INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES, AND CONCRETE DAMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 7, 1997 |
| 042 | CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF CONCRETE REHABILITATION, RECONSTRUCTION, DESALINIZATION, REALKALISATION, CORROSION PASSIVATION, AND ELECTROCHEMICAL METHODS FOR CONCRETE RESTORATION OF BRIDGES, PARKING STRUCTURES, ROADS, DOCKS, BUILDING FACADES, RETAINING WALLS, INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES AND CONCRETE DAMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 7, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Infrastructure Repair Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Infrastructure Repair Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Infrastructure Repair Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named IRT INFRASTRUCTURE REPAIR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 13, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 31, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |