Drawing for BANKINTERNET

USPTO serial 75906377

BANKINTERNET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BANKINTERNET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles P. LaPolla

CHARLES P LAPOLLA OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN LLP7TH FL1180 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036financial services, namely banking services, mortgage and other loan services, financial planning services, investment services, insurance services and bill presentment and payment servicesACTIVE—
038Telecommunication and communication services, namely television and radio broadcasting services, electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals, telephone communication services, paging services, telecommunication information services, text and numeric wireless digital messaging services, wireless digital messaging services, wireless facsimile mail services, wireless PBX services, wireless voice mail servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 5, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 8, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 5, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 3, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 4, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 4, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 4, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 1, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 5, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 4, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 4, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 4, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 4, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 4, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 3, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 3, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 4, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 12, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 22, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 7, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 7, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 5, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 25, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 18, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 20041.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED—
Jun 9, 200444EDSEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED—
Jun 9, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2004CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 3, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 29, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 30, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance