Drawing for LAWRAGE

USPTO serial 75906444

LAWRAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANDIR, FREDERICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAWRAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

L. Daniel Liutikas

L DANIEL LIUTIKAS MUCH SHELIST FREED DENENBERG AMENT & RUBSTE 1800191 N WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606-1615

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Legal services, namely, legal consultation, arbitration, mediation, and alternative dispute resolution; providing an on-line computer information database in the field of legal issuesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 12, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 25, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 25, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 13, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 10, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 7, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 14, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 13, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 20, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 28, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 8, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 13, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 13, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance