Drawing for CDFM CERTIFIED DEFENSE FINANCIAL MANAGER

USPTO serial 75906665

CDFM CERTIFIED DEFENSE FINANCIAL MANAGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2901899Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 9, 2004
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with CDFM CERTIFIED DEFENSE FINANCIAL MANAGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas W. Brooke

Thomas W. Brooke Holland & Knight LLP800 17th Street, NWSuite 1100Washington, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Association services namely promoting the interests of Certified Defense Financial ManagersACTIVEJan 1, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 21, 2025NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2025RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jan 21, 202589AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jan 6, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 19, 2024E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
May 8, 2024ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 9, 2023REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2014NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2014RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jan 23, 201489AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jan 23, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 9, 201489AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Jan 9, 2014E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 20108.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Jul 27, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 26, 2010ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 15, 2004REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 13, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 6, 2004CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Sep 2, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 22, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 17, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2004CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Mar 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 25, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 20, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 22, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 22, 2004EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 20, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 28, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 8, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 24, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 7, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 18, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 9, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 1, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 23, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance