USPTO serial 75906689
EPHOTOSYNC.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
- Law office
- OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EPHOTOSYNC.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin R. Greenstein.
Martin R. Greenstein TechMark a Law Corporation4820 Harwood Road, 2nd FloorSan Jose, CA 95124-5273UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Communications services, acting as a communications services provider and an Internet service provider; providing multiple user access to the Internet or other local area, wide area or enterprise networks for purposes of voice, data and other communications and messaging services; providing wired or wireless e-mail, messaging, on-line access, Internet and world wide web (WWW) access services;Creating and maintaining a website and Internet portal which provides users with wired and wireless access to and the ability to create, enhance, modify, transmit, receive, exchange, store and synchronize information, audio and video data and files, multimedia files, ephotos, photographic and graphic files and images, and e-mail with or without attached files, ephotos and images; photographic and digital photography services, electronic photo and image services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 4, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 19, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |