USPTO serial 75906733
B
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with B?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LOS ANGELES, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer Ko Craft, John L. Krieger & Robert B. Kouchoukos
Jennifer Ko Craft, John L. Krieger & Robert B. Kou Dickinson Wright PLLC8363 West Sunset Road, Suite 200Las Vegas, NV 89113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Musical sound recordings, phonograph records, compact discs, audio cassettes, videotapes and audio/visual discs, all pre-recorded and featuring music, musical video recording, sunglasses, eyeglasses, eyeglass cases, sunglass cases, 35 mm cameras, camera cases, computer mouse pads, and decorative magnets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 29, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 27, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 10, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 8, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |