Drawing for DYNAMIC DIRECTIONS

USPTO serial 75906879

DYNAMIC DIRECTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DYNAMIC DIRECTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. REED JOHNSTON JR.

MS MARLA H MARTIN DYNAMIC DIRECTIONS, L.L.C.PO BOX 672MAYODAN, NC 27025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041EMPLOYEE TRAINING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF CUSTOMER SERVICE SKILLS, COMMUNICATION SKILLS, TEAM BUILDING SKILLS, AND TIME MANAGEMENT SKILLSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Aug 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 26, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 25, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 25, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 5, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 5, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 11, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 6, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 22, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 21, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 6, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance