USPTO serial 75906880
ENGINEERING IN MOTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENGINEERING IN MOTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Rockford, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tina D. Kourasis
TINA D KOURASIS GARDNER, CARTON & DOUGLAS321 N CLARK STSTE 3400CHICAGO, IL 60610Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Custom design and manufacture of industrial automation machines, namely, hydraulic, pneumatic, electric indexing and rotary tables, planetary tables, NC controlled tables, multi-axis combination machines for positioning and rotating parts, tools and materials; industrial robots and robotic handling machines; gantry robots for loading and unloading workpieces, floor rail mounted robots, pneumatic, hydraulic and electric slides; pneumatic, hydraulic and electric rotaries, pneumatic, hydraulic and electric grippers; tool and die parts, namely, die sets, hoists, fixtures in the nature of steel, aluminum, cast iron die sets, lifting hoists, shanks, spigots, lifter studs, lifting hooks, eyebolts, ring blocks, clamping claws, clamps, adjustable supports, stepped blocks, setscrews, T-head bolts, clamps, brackets, guides, pillars, pins, steel and sintered linear bushings, ball cages, roller cages, oilless elements, namely, mounting flanges, thrust washers, bushings, strips, bars, pads, cams, gibs, 'P-bars, L-bars, prismatic guides; precision ground components, namely, punches, bushings, matrixes, ball-lock retainers and punches, dowel pins, drill bushings, ejector pins, ejector sleeves, gauge pins; compression springs, nitrogen springs, elastomer springs, disc springs, elastomer tooling, conveyor belts, lubricators and chemical tooling equipment in the nature of epoxies, resins, degreasing spray, release agents, grease and oil lubricants, leak finder spray, metal adhesive, anaerobic metal adhesives, marking blue | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 30, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 30, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |