Drawing for INSTRUMENTAL IN E-BUSINESS

USPTO serial 75906989

INSTRUMENTAL IN E-BUSINESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INSTRUMENTAL IN E-BUSINESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

TIMOTHY D. PECSENYE

TIMOTHY D PECSENYE BLANK ROME COMISKY & MCCAULEY LLPONE LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, COMPONENT SOFTWARE FOR USE IN BUILDING ENTERPRISE INTERNET PORTAL SOLUTIONSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 18, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 24, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 15, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 3, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 10, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance