USPTO serial 75907089
ISERV SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 28, 2003
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ISERV SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Innovative Systems Development, Inc.
Toledo, OH
Other trademarks owned by Innovative Systems Development, Inc.
Innovative Systems Development, Inc.
Toledo, OH
Other trademarks owned by Innovative Systems Development, Inc.
Innovative Systems Development, Inc.
Toledo, OH
Other trademarks owned by Innovative Systems Development, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louis Treiger
700 FIFTH AVE STE 6100SEATTLE, WA 98104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for providing human services organizations with real time data regarding providers, patients and delivered services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 1999 |
| 042 | design and implementation of computer systems for human service organizations which provide real time data regarding providers, patients and delivered services; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Innovative Systems Development, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Innovative Systems Development, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Innovative Systems Development, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ISERV SYSTEMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |