Drawing for MAGIC GUMBALL

USPTO serial 75907127

MAGIC GUMBALL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MAGIC GUMBALL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christie Gamner

CHRISTIE GAMNER LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTIE GAUMER900 WILSHIRE BLVDSTE 1020LOS ANGELES, CA 90017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009coin operated vending machines disbursing gumballs and gumball accessories, including toys and prizes housed in plastic containersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 16, 2002ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Apr 9, 2002RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Mar 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance