USPTO serial 75907138
MARTHA STEWART EVERYDAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2911894Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 21, 2004
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MARTHA STEWART EVERYDAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc.
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc.
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc.
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc.
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc.
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | FORK; HAND TOOLS, namely, TONGS, ZESTERS, NON-ELECTRIC FRUIT PEELERS, NON-ELECTRIC CAN OPENERS, FOUNDRY LADLES, SPOONS; APPLE CORER, PARING KNIFE, PIZZA CUTTER, EGG SLICER, APPLE SLICER | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 15, 2000 |
| 021 | HOUSEHOLD UTENSILS, NAMELY, GRATER, SPATULA, BASTING SPOONS, SPOONS, WHISK, PIE SERVER, NON-ELECTRIC CITRUS JUICER, COLANDER FOR HOUSEHOLD USE, CINDER SIFTER FOR HOUSEHOLD USE, POTATO MASHER, MELON BALLER, CORN COB HOLDERS, ICE-CREAM SCOOP, BOTTLE OPENERS, HOUSEHOLD UTENSILS, NAMELY, SKIMMERS, VEGETABLE BRUSHES, MIXING BOWLS, CAST ALUMINUM TRIVETS, GARLIC PRESS; BRUSHES FOR BASTING MEAT, COOKWARE, NAMELY, COLLAPSIBLE STEAMERS, FUNNELS WITH STRAINER, TEA BALLS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, CITRUS REAMER FOR FRUIT JUICE, CORKSCREWS, GLASS STOPPERS, STOVE BURNER COVERS, CHROME-PLATED PAPER-TOWEL HOLDER, *COOKIE* [ COOKER] CUTTERS, ROLLING PINS, CANISTER SETS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 15, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named MARTHA STEWART EVERYDAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 5, 2005 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 25, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 25, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |