USPTO serial 75907195
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc.
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc.
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc.
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc.
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc.
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexandra Nicholson, Esq.
ALEXANDRA NICHOLSON, ESQ. DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP1633 BROADWAY, 27TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10019-6708UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Dinnerware, beverageware, bakeware and cookware, namely, skillets, pans, pots, steamers, non-electric griddles, pot and pan lids, roasting pans, canners consisting of a pot and non-electric woks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 15, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 23, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |