Drawing for ODIMO.COM

USPTO serial 75907204

ODIMO.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALTREE, NICHOLAS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ODIMO.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian D. Anderson

BRIAN D ANDERSON OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUST1755 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYFOURTH FLARLINGTON, VA 22202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Precious gemstones; fine jewelry; watchesACTIVE—
035Computerized online ordering services featuring jewelry and gemstones; online retail store services featuring jewelry and gemstonesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 16, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 31, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 25, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance