USPTO serial 75907209
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ZEESEN, DE
ELDAT Gesellschaft fur Elektronik und Datentechnik mbH
D-15711 Zeesen, DE
Other trademarks owned by ELDAT Gesellschaft fur Elektronik und Datentechnik mbH
ELDAT Gesellschaft fur Elektronik und Datentechnik mbH
D-15711 Zeesen, DE
Other trademarks owned by ELDAT Gesellschaft fur Elektronik und Datentechnik mbH
ELDAT Gesellschaft fur Elektronik und Datentechnik mbH
D-15711 Zeesen, DE
Other trademarks owned by ELDAT Gesellschaft fur Elektronik und Datentechnik mbH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harvey B. Jacobson, Jr.
Harvey B. Jacobson, Jr. JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7th St., N.W.Suite 700Washington, DC 20004| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | RADIO SYSTEMS, COMPRISED OF RADIO TRANSMITTERS; RADIO REMOTE CONTROLS; DATA RADIO SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF DATA RADIO TRANSMITTERS AND DATA RADIO RECEIVERS; RADIO CONTROLLED BURGLAR ALARMS; FIRE ALARMS; ANTI-INTRUSION ALARMS; PERSONAL SECURITY ALARMS; CONTROL SYSTEMS, NAMELY ELECTRICAL CONTROLLERS USED AS PART OF AN ELECTRIC GARAGE DOOR OPENER OR AS ELECTRICAL LIGHTING CONTROLLERS; ACCESS SYSTEMS, NAMELY ELECTRONIC AND ELECTROMAGNETIC AS WELL AS RADIO-ENGINEERED IDENTIFICATION DEVICES BASED ON CARD READERS, RADIO TRANSMITTERS AND/OR BIOMETRIC DETECTION; TRANSPONDERS; ELECTRONIC CONTROLLERS COMPRISING INDUCTION LOOPS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS, NAMELY DEVELOPMENT OF HIGH FREQUENCY RADIO TRANSMITTERS, RECEIVERS, AND MICRO CONTROLLERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 30, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 14, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 12, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 17, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 7, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |