USPTO serial 75907250
EYESHOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PIGNATELLO, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EYESHOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THEODORE D LIENESCH
THEODORE D LIENESCH THOMPSON HINE & FLORY LLP10 W 2ND ST STE 2000COURTHOUSE PLZ NEDAYTON, OH 45402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | CONTACT LENS SOLUTIONS; CONTACT LENS CLEANING SOLUTIONS; AND CLEANING SOLUTIONS FOR EYEGLASSES AND SUNGLASSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | EYEGLASSES; EYEGLASS FRAMES; EYEGLASS CASES; EYEGLASS LENSES; SUNGLASSES; CONTACT LENSES; CASES FOR CONTACT LENSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | OPTICIANS' SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tillman, Gary Lee
- Other trademarks owned by Tillman, Gary Lee
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EYESHOP
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 4, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 14, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 19, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 20, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |