Drawing for BLOOM OF THE MONTH

USPTO serial 75907313

BLOOM OF THE MONTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRAY, CAROLYN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLOOM OF THE MONTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THOMAS M. GALGANO

THOMAS M GALGANO GALGANO & BURKE300 RABRO DR STE 135HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Live fresh-cut flowers, plants and floral bouquetsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 22, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 18, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 18, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 23, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 6, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 3, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 2, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 17, 2004CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 2, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 26, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2003REINREINSTATED—
Feb 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2000LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Nov 14, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 22, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 17, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 11, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 5, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance