USPTO serial 75907313
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS M. GALGANO
THOMAS M GALGANO GALGANO & BURKE300 RABRO DR STE 135HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Live fresh-cut flowers, plants and floral bouquets | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |