Drawing for BANKAT.COM

USPTO serial 75907328

BANKAT.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BANKAT.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SHIRENA HAIFLEY

2250 E TROPICANA, STE 449LAS VEGAS, NV 89119UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer services, namely creating indexes of information sites and other resources available on computer networks; providing on line links to general areas related to news, reference materials, current eventsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jul 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 17, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 23, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance